GNP and demystify the VAK representational system 
GNP and demystify the representational system of VAK
In recent years, for various reasons I have come across often in texts, discussions, experiments, tests, treatments, manipulation, reprogramming, research, hypnosis, analysis, data collection, observation, persuasion, etc.. referring to the VAK system:
representational systems
VAK, NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming):
Everyone has different ways to represent their own experience and reality in the world or rather build his map of the territory (which sembrebbe actually change the territory itself).
In fact I think even though they say / write that encode and process information to us from the outside world through the sensory systems of our nervous system generally identified with: visual cenesthetic, auditory, olfactory and gustatory,
usually leave out the energy system, or "hidden" of being both human, animal, vegetable, mineral, etc. . (See Roberto Zamperini and others who carry out research in a serious way,
even though in general there is a nice soup among the various schools of thought etc.. And it often falls into the "New Age" or certain people and / or Their work is mixed and distorted, or seeks to invalidate all the staff, see Hammer, energy therapy, etc. pisicoenergetica.
or are themselves (authors) to make a nice soup, an example the various strands that work based on alleged photos or images taken in a certain way on what is called aura-sig! -)
and other things that fly over hours,
The representational system can be defined as: the ways in which Internally we represent our world and its representation, our personal sphere, we can communicate to others or not, etc.. I will not dwell, there are flower of texts defininizione. In
GNP (Neuro Linguistic Programming) this representational system is simplified and encapsulated in three categories:
visual, auditory
and
cenesthetic ( latter captures the sense of smell and taste). This, in specific terms, is called VAK
.
The view (visual),
hearing (auditory) and
bodily sensations (kinesthetic which include smell and taste) are the channels through which "build" within us our thoughts, plans, map and at the same time the channels through which external to the other with language.
is why they are often referred to as input channels, ie channels that allow me to enter the world of my interlocutor.
usually write that everyone uses all three channels but generally most of them say that "... there is always a predominance of one over others ...", according to the hypothesis and / or claimed by their predecessors-and contemporaries pregiudizzi reviews> to a more or less established way of thinking, expression, etc. act. according to certain patterns of thought and the map / ball staff, for the situation, how he feels at that moment, the memory still (physically, unconsciously, psychologically, energetically, the representational systems etc.). the person you are interacting, studying, analyzing, listening, helping and so on.
The main characteristics of each channel is indicated by the movements of the bulbs occulari. (in the Web are images and detailed explanations), but I have some reservations, there are good actors or people who have certain disorders or other, or perhaps are not as good at identifying sgenali sometimes almost imperceptible, and other things that I'm still working,
however, in addition to research
Corrado Malanga (by which years ago I became interested in studying and 360 °) and more "Voices," a picture emerges in which the Unconscious records everything, so use all channels available to it (if there are problems such as blindness, etc..)
also several "voices" that emerge
mind does not distinguish what is truly lived by what is
only vividly imagined
(usually describing such thing as imagination / visualization in which all channels are used and the emotions) also see the work of
Corrado Malanga freely downloadable from their site, which is excellent and enlightening in many respects even more going forward a lot about specific issues.
So where comes the caz ta ... that according to some tests with a few questions a person uses primarily a channel rather that of another ... a test from what I've seen and read in recent years that consider only a probable or likely immagnaria crumb or life experience of a person who will usually respond to just one of three options and then clicking the that "at that moment" feels more real / consonant etc..,
I think this thing is forced and distorted, is somehow a manipulation, because each of us according to the moment, as it is in place, the people with whom you interact, etc.. use one or the other channel, defined as output but uses them all as income, so why make "limited" this person with definitions / reviews> type ... cenestico you are, you view and so on. give him a limiting belief and false? this is what I noticed in most cases,
then going through the facilitators, consuelor and other individuals and / or through introspection and self-knowledge to rule out such a piece of the pie as important as everything else?
people that in these years, I Hano wrote:
ah .. I'm hearing is why we do not understand and there will never understand ...
ah ... I can not do that technique, it is only visual and I'm cenesthetic ...
ah .. I'm visual and I do not feel ...
etc. ...
and then this means that, thankfully, there are people going on about how much there is to make available variants, however, in most cases continuing to build on the representational system that has emerged as dominant without involving everyone else or just in fraction,
in most cases, by what they read and heard over the years who relies on those tests and considerations from time to time instead of using all channels and use this test in another way that the person who turned them identify that in this situation / etc Case Study. according to the prevalence of certain channels that it can be a sign of a bell or port to which to direct our attention (as our unconscious / subconscious mind has passed through the filters only a portion of the information and the hidden / etc inhibited. is what is missing to get the full picture that could very well change the whole) to risovere better and the first thing any work it is, giving that person the opportunity to have greater awareness and understanding of self, but you
in most cases the effect / action opposed to Europe, and limiting with certain techniques in fact often "or hiding away" the problem that this can not be identified, so I heard several people who practice NLP or other methods or work of introspection that there is a percentage that has no results and / or after some time back to the starting point,
"playing" in recent years I have often seen that people who use these tests then pregiudizzi and preconceptions in a way you approach the person in front of them and I tried to do too 'I
bearing in mind what they write in the various texts of GNP, tracing, etc., breaking away from empathy while watching it, then
not know if it's the same for everyone, for me the different channels are activated and are more or less predominant (in and out to the conscious) in different situations, moments and people with whom I'm interacting,
if I am painting most of the time are cenesthetic visual and aural for nothing, other times they are more visual and aural, but there are times or situations or people in / with which I was more visual for such times and situations, this is also related to the "memory" of past events and any new things that maybe I was living at that time or situation, other than I was hard of hearing and so on.
if I talk to a person depending on the topic and the involvement of the spot, so how I feel. idem, things are constantly changing, I have moments when are mostly auditory, but in reality this is just what comes to the conscious or that I think consciously or not to share certain words instead of using other (and the reasons can be many) and so for me the test went on as long as this value take for example, only certain situations and conditioning is limiting,
to me was always to answer: Depending on the situation, person, time of day or time that I had and so on. but there is no option to give that answer,
correct me, or rather, a value has to a certain point if it is evaluated for what it is because it is reductive, generalizing and limiting as it is used in most of cases, also taking into account that it is the here and now "and you return with memories like this, then this changes things again because you are not the same as when it happened and at the same time reviving now this is changed the consciousness here and now, in a nutshell and in my opinion is always good to work with all channels equally and perhaps even those that appear / would be "minor" may be actually more important because the situation at that time and so on. it has been decided or are programmed is: non-hear-or see-or not-feel etc..
the fact to identify / label a person or a person through the text is presented as "hello, have visual!" I think it's wrong if you rely only on this and if you disclose certain statements,
should be expanded in the sense that working with a number of channels if this was less about a thing / experience / memory / trauma etc.. on which you are working on this that we should focus and work on bringing awareness to an observer or as an outside observer to restore that part of yourself that has concealed the data in that channel, such as when using the camera (see job Corrado Malanga on "anchor and external cameras), so you can retrieve appropriate data for the channel / representational system that is less than this and understand the reason for certain things happen like that, coming to solve even more things at once, to have greater self-awareness and more ^ _ ^
that we register all without distinction there can be no preferred channel or greater / more used than others, if a situation at that time and so on. is less than the others there is something that could affect everything else, not by his side to get the full picture or anything, so if using these tests we tend to pay attention to those channels that are emerging (at that time) and "devalue" the others and easily Cometto bury the mistake of still more "things" of the person at that moment in his most deep in the unconscious will feel better and so divided. then to create more misunderstanding of himself, those channels that seem less inhibited and the test would be used as the case may actually alarm bells and gates to get to know themselves and the things that we lack to process, metabolize and let go of the past things that influence us in everyday life at various levels to create real problems also in the various areas of our lives,
then repeat, this soria to define the channel / second representational system for me as used in most cases it is a great caz .. ta for what people then put them in head-sig! -, restraining influence on several fronts,
"ahh you're cenesthetic ... ahh ... ahh you're so visual."
agree with what I wrote a friend, that the test is important for a person to understand that there is a representational system, and in fact for me since I learned of this, thanks to Malanga, I happen to do attention to the words I use or have used while on the job on "know thyself" allows me to assess from time to time why a certain problem / memory etc.. I lack the data to a channel and understand more.
so beware;)
then I may be wrong, this is also a work
in progress, nothing definitive!
Valentina Zorzi
^ _ ^
